Shareware Grab Bag/Shareware Grab Bag.iso/007/a86v307c.arc/10RELOC.DOC

Text File | 1987-07-13 | 32KB | 641 lines

CHAPTER 10   RELOCATION AND LINKAGE                       10-1

Since this is the start of the A86VxxxC.ARC file, I'll repeat
here that the entire A86 package is Copyright (C)1986--1987 Eric
Isaacson.  All rights reserved.  If this is all you've got, you
need to get A86VxxxA.ARC, and A86VxxxB.ARC, which contain the
program and the first part of the manual.

A86 allows you to produce either .COM files, which can be run
immediately as standalone programs, or .OBJ files, to be fed to
the MS-DOS LINK program.  In this chapter I'll discuss .OBJ mode
of A86.


.OBJ Production Made Easy

I'll start by giving you the minimum amount of information you
need to know to produce .OBJ files.  If you are writing short
interface routines, and do not want to concern yourself with the
esoterica of OBJ files (segments, groups, publics, etc.), you can
survive quite nicely by reading only this section.

There are two ways you can cause A86 to produce a .OBJ file as
its object output.  One way is to explicitly give .OBJ as the
output file name: for example, you can assemble the source file
FOO.8 by giving the command "A86 FOO.8 FOO.OBJ".  The other way
is to specify the switch +O (letter O not digit 0).  This is
illustrated by the invocation "A86 +O FOO.8", which will have the
same effect as the first invocation.

My design philosophy for .OBJ production is to accommodate two
types of user.  The first type of user is writing new code, to
link to other (usually high-level language) modules.  That person
should be able to write the module with a minimum of red tape,
and have A86 do the right thing.  The second type of user has
existing modules written for Intel/IBM assemblers, and wants to
port them to A86.  A86 should recognize and act upon all the
relocation directives (SEGMENT, GROUP, PUBLIC, EXTRN, NAME, END)
given.  The assembly should work even if several files, assembled
separately under the Intel/IBM assembler, are fed to a single A86
assembly.  You'll see if you read on through this entire chapter
that the multiple-files requirement causes A86 to interpret some
of the relocation directives a little differently (while
achieving compatible results).

Let's suppose you're writing new code: for example, an interface
routine to the "C" language, that multiplies a 16-bit number by
10.  "C" pushes the input number onto the stack, before calling
your routine.  Your code needs to get the number, multiply it by
10, and return the answer in the AX register.  You can code it:

_MUL10:          ; "C" expects all public names to start with "_"
  PUSH BP        ; "C" expects BP to be preserved
  MOV BP,SP      ; we use BP to address the stack
  MOV AX,[BP+4]  ; fetch the number N, beyond BP and the ret addr
  ADD AX,AX      ; 2N
  MOV BX,AX      ; 2N is saved in BX
  ADD AX,AX      ; 4N
  ADD AX,AX      ; 8N
  ADD AX,BX      ; 8N + 2N = 10N
  POP BP         ; BP is restored
  RET            ; go back to caller
                                                          10-2
These 11 lines can be your entire source file!  If you name the
file MUL10.8, A86 will create an object file MUL10.OBJ, that
conforms to the standard SMALL model of computation for high-
level languages.  If you use RETF instead of RET (thus, by the
way, getting the operand from BP+6 instead of BP+4), the object
module will conform to the standard LARGE model of computation.
All the red-tape information required by the high-level language
is provided implicitly by A86.  I'll go through this information
in detail later, but you should need to read about it only if
you're curious.

What happens if you need to access symbols outside the module
you're assembling?  If the type of the symbol is correctly
guessed from the instruction that refers to it, then you can
simply refer to it, and leave it undefined within the module.
For example, if A86 sees the instruction CALL PRINT with PRINT
undefined, it will assume that PRINT is a NEAR procedure.  If
PRINT is never defined within the module, A86 will act as if you
declared PRINT via the directive EXTRN PRINT:NEAR.  The address
of PRINT will be plugged into your instruction by LINK when it
combines A86's .OBJ file with the high-level language's .OBJ
files, to make the final program.

In general, the undefined operand to any CALL or JMP instruction
is assumed to be NEAR.  The second (source) operand to a MOV or
arithmetic instruction is assumed to be ABS (i.e., an immediate
constant).  An undefined first (destination) operand is assumed
to be a simple memory variable, of the same size (BYTE or WORD)
as the register given in the second operand.  If your external
symbol does not comply with these guidelines, you need to declare
it with an EXTRN before you use it.  (You can also use EXTRN to
declare types of non-complying forward-references within your
module, as you'll see later.)

At this point, if you're a casual user, I think you've read
enough to get going!  Read further only if you wish; or if you
get stuck, and need to master the esoterica.


Overview of Relocation and Linkage

When you assemble a program directly into a .COM file, the
program has just two forms: the source program, that you can
understand, and the .COM file, that the computer can "understand"
(i.e., execute).  A .OBJ file is an intermediate format: neither
you nor the (executing) computer can make sense out a .OBJ file;
only programs like LINK interpret .OBJ files.  The purpose of a
.OBJ file is to allow you to assemble or compile just a part of a
program.  The other parts (also in the form of .OBJ files) can be
produced at a different time; often by a different assembler or
compiler, whose source files are in a different language.  It's
easy to see where the word "linkage" comes from: the LINK program
puts the pieces of a program together.  The "relocation" comes
because the assembler or compiler that makes a given program
piece doesn't know how many other pieces will come before it, or
how big the other pieces will be.  Each piece is constructed as
if it started at location 0 within the program; then LINK
"relocates" the piece to its true location.
                                                          10-3
Many of the relocation features of 86 assembly language are
couched in terms of LINK's point of view, so we must look at the
way LINK sees things.  LINK calls a .OBJ file an "object module",
or just "module".  Each module has a NAME, that can be referred
to when LINK issues diagnostic messages, such as error messages
and symbol maps.  If a program symbol is used only within a
single module, it does not need to be given to LINK, except
possibly to pass along to a symbolic debugger.  On the other
hand, if a program symbol is defined in one module and referenced
in other modules, then LINK needs to know the name of the symbol,
so it can resolve the references.  Such a symbol is PUBLIC in the
module in which it is defined; it is "external" in the other
modules, containing references to it.  Finally, exactly one
module in a program must contain the starting location for the
program; that module is called the "main module", and it must
supply the starting address (which is not necessarily at the
beginning of the module).

In the 86 family of microprocessors, the LINK system also does
much to manage the memory segments that a program will fit into,
and get its data from.  The (grotesquely ornate) level of support
for segmentation was dictated by Intel when it specified (and IBM
and the compiler-makers accepted) the format that .OBJ files will
have.  I attended the fateful meeting at Intel, in which the
crucial design decisions were made.  I regret to say that I sat
quietly, while engineers more senior than I applied their fertile
imaginations to construct fanciful scenarios which they felt had
to be supported by LINK.  Let's now review the resulting
segmentation model.

The parts of a program, as viewed by LINK, come in three
different sizes: they can be (1) pieces of a single segment, (2)
an entire single segment, or (3) a sequence of consecutive
segments in 86 memory.  Size (1) should have been called
something like FRAGMENT, but is instead called SEGMENT.  Size (2)
should have been called SEGMENT, but is instead called GROUP.
Size (3) should have been called "group", but is instead called
"class".  Let me cling to the sensible terminology for one more
paragraph, while I describe the worst scenario Intel wanted to
support; then when I discuss individual directives, I'll
regretfully revert to the official terminology.
                                                          10-4
The scenario is as follows: suppose you have a program that
occupies about 100K bytes of memory.  The program contains a core
of 20K bytes of utility routines that every part of the program
calls.  You'd like every part of the program to be able to call
these routines, using the NEAR form to save memory.  By gum, you
can do it!  You simply(!) slice the program into three fragments:
the utility routines will go into fragment U, and the rest of the
program will be split into equal-sized 40K-byte fragments A and
B.  Now you arrange the fragments in 8086 memory in the order
A,U,B.  The fragments A and U form a 60K-byte block, addressed by
a segment-register value G1, that points to the beginning of A.
The fragments U and B form another 60K-byte block addressed by a
segment-register value G2, that points to the beginning of U.  If
you set the CS register to G1 when A is executing, and G2 when B
is executing, the U fragment is accessible at all times.  Since
all direct JMPs and CALLs are encoded as relative offsets, the U-
code will execute direct jumps correctly whether addressed by G1
with a huge offset, or G2 with a small offset.  Of course, if U
contains any absolute pointers referring to itself (such as an
indirect near JMP or CALL), you're in trouble.

It's now been nine years since the fateful design meeting took
place, and I can report that the above scenario has never taken
place in the real world.  And I can state with some authority
that it never will.  The reason is that the only programs that
exceed 64K bytes in size are coded in high-level language, not
assembly language.  High-level language compilers follow a very,
very restricted segmentation model-- no existing model comes
remotely close to supporting the scheme suggested by the
scenario.  But the 86 assembly language can support it-- the
directives "G1 GROUP A,U" and "G2 GROUP B,U", followed by chunks
of code of the appropriate object size, headed by directives "A
SEGMENT", "B SEGMENT", and "U SEGMENT".  The LINK program is
supposed to sort things out according to the scenario; but I
can't say (and I have my doubts) if it actually succeeds in doing
so.

The concept of "class" was added as an afterthought, to implement
the more sensible and usable features that outsiders thought
GROUPs were implementing;  namely, the ability to specify that
different (and disjoint!) segments occur consecutively in memory.
This allows programs to be arranged in a consistent manner-- for
example, with all program code followed by all static data
segments followed by all dynamically-allocated memory.
                                                          10-5
The NAME Directive

Syntax:   NAME module_name

The NAME directive specifies that "module_name" be given to LINK
as the name of the module produced by this assembly.  The symbol
"module_name" can be used elsewhere in your program without
conflict: it can even, if you like, be a built-in assembler
mnemonic (e.g. "NAME MOV" is acceptable)!

If you do not provide a NAME directive, A86 will use the name of
the output object file, without the .OBJ extension.   If you
provide more than one NAME directive, A86 will use the last one
given, with no error reported.



The PUBLIC Directive

Syntax:   PUBLIC  sym1, sym2, sym3, ...
          PUBLIC

The PUBLIC directive allows you to explicitly list the symbols
defined in this assembly, that can be used by other modules.  If
you do not give any PUBLIC directives in your program, A86 will
use every relocatable label and variable name in your program,
except local labels (the redefinable labels consisting of a
letter followed by digits: L7, M1, Q234, etc.).  Symbols EQUated
to constants, and symbols defined within structures and DATA
SEGMENTs, are not implicitly declared PUBLIC: you have to
explicitly include them in a PUBLIC directive.

A86 maintains an internal flag, telling it whether to figure out
for itself which symbols are PUBLIC, or to let the program
explicitly declare them.  The flag starts out "implicit", and is
set to "explicit" only if A86 sees a PUBLIC directive with no
names at all, or a PUBLIC directive containing at least one name
that would have been implicitly made PUBLIC.

If you are writing new code, you'll probably want to keep the
flag "implicit".  You use the PUBLIC directive only for those
symbols which have the form of local labels, but aren't (e.g., a
memory variable I1987 for 1987 income); and for absolute values
that are globally accessed -- e.g. specify "PUBLIC
OPEN_FILES_LIMIT" for a symbol defined as "OPEN_FILES_LIMIT EQU
20".

If you are porting existing code, that code will already have
PUBLIC directives in it, and A86 will go to "explicit" mode,
duplicating the functionality of other assemblers.

The PUBLIC directive with no names is used to force "explicit"
mode, thus causing (if there are no further PUBLICs with names)
the .OBJ file to declare no symbols PUBLIC.
                                                          10-6
There is another side effect to the PUBLIC directive: if a symbol
is declared PUBLIC in a module, it had better be defined in that
module.  If it isn't then A86 includes it in the .ERR listing of
undefined symbols in the module, and suppresses output of the
object file.


The EXTRN Directive

Syntax:  EXTRN  sym1:type, sym2:type, ...

     where "type" is one of:  BYTE WORD DWORD QWORD TBYTE FAR
            or synonymously:  B    W    D     Q     T     F
                         or:  NEAR  ABS

The EXTRN directive allows you to attach a type to a symbol that
may not yet be defined (and may never be defined) within your
program.  This is often necessary for the assembler to generate
the correct instruction form when the symbol is used as an
operand.  All the possible types except ABS are defined elsewhere
in the A86 language, but I list them again here for convenience:

   B or BYTE:  byte-sized memory variable
   W or WORD:  word (2 byte) sized memory variable
   D or DWORD: doubleword (4-byte) sized memory variable
   Q or QWORD: quadword (8-byte) sized memory variable
   T or TWORD: 10-byte-sized memory variable
   NEAR:       program label accessed within a segment
   FAR:        program label accessed from outside this segment
   ABS:        an absolute number (i.e., an immediate constant)

An example of EXTRN usage is as follows: suppose there is a word
memory variable IFARK in your program.  The variable might be
declared at the end of the program; or it might be defined in a
module completely outside of this program.  Without an EXTRN
directive, A86 will assemble an instruction such as "MOV
AX,IFARK" as the loading of an immediate constant IFARK into the
AX register.  If you place the directive "EXTRN IFARK:W" at the
top of your program, you'll get the correct instruction form for
MOV AX,IFARK-- moving a word memory variable into the AX
register.

A86 will allow more than one EXTRN directive for a given symbol,
as long as the same type is given every time.  A86 will even
allow an EXTRN directive for a symbol that has already been
defined, as long as the type declared is consistent with the
symbol's definition.  These allowances exist so that you can
assemble multiple files written for another assembler, that had
been fed separately to that assembler.
                                                          10-7
Note that EXTRN is viewed by A86 quite differently by A86 than by
other assemblers.  In fact, if it weren't for those other
assemblers, I'd use the mnemonic DECLARE instead of EXTRN.  A86
doesn't really use EXTRN to determine which symbols are external-
- it uses those symbols that are undefined at the end of
assembly.  As I stated earlier in the chapter, an undefined
symbol can be referenced without being declared via EXTRN.
Conversely, a defined symbol can be declared (and redeclared) via
EXTRN; being defined, such a symbol will not be specified
"external" in the .OBJ file.

Because EXTRN is useful in forward-reference situations, it is
now recognized even when A86 is assembling a .COM file.

For those of you who are accustomed to the more traditional use
of EXTRN, and who do not like external records to be created
"behind your back", A86 offers the "+x" option.  If you include
"+x" in the program invocation, A86 will require that all
undefined symbols be explicitly declared via an EXTRN.  Any
undefined, undeclared symbols will be included in the .ERR
listing of undefined symbols, and object file output will be
suppressed.


MAIN: The Starting Location for a Program

I've already stated that exactly one module in a program is the
"main" module, containing the starting address of the entire
program.  In A86 when assembling .OBJ files, the starting address
is given by the label MAIN.  You simply provide the label "MAIN:"
where you want the program to start.  The module containing MAIN
is the main module.


The END Directive

Syntax:  END
         END start_addr

The END directive is used by other assemblers for two purposes,
both of which are now a little silly.  The first purpose is to
signal the end of assembly.  This was necessary back in the days
when source files were input on media such as paper tape: you had
to tell the assembler explicitly that the contents of the tape
has ended.  Today the operating system can tell you when you've
reached the end of the file, so this function is an anachronism.

The second purpose of END is, nonsensically, to allow you to
specify the starting location of the program.  I suppose the
person who wrote the first assembler back in the 1950's was too
short on memory to implement a separate START directive, or a
MAIN label like A86 has, and decided to let END do double-duty.
I've always considered the example "END START" to have an Alice-
in-Wonderland quality; it is fuel for the high-level-language
snobs who like to attack assembly language.  Please defeat the
snobs, and use "MAIN:" if you are writing new code.
                                                          10-8
For compatibility, A86 treats "END start_addr" exactly the same as
if you had coded "MAIN EQU start_addr".  Note that if you want
your program to assemble under both A86 and that other assembler,
you can specify "END MAIN"-- A86 treats MAIN EQU MAIN as a legal
redefinition of the symbol MAIN.

A86 ignores END when there is no starting-address operand, thus
allowing assembly of multiple files written for other assemblers.


The SEGMENT Directive

Syntax:  seg_name SEGMENT [align] [combine] ['class_name']

where "align" is one of:  BYTE   WORD   PARA   PAGE
    "combine" is one of:  PUBLIC  STACK  COMMON  MEMORY  AT number

The SEGMENT directive says that assembled object code will
henceforth go to a block of code whose name is "seg_name".
"seg_name" is a symbol that represents a value that can be loaded
into a segment register.  If "seg_name" is not declared in a
GROUP directive, then its value should in fact be loaded into a
segment register, in order to address the code.  If "seg_name" is
declared in a GROUP directive, then the code is a a part of the
segment addressed by the name of the group.

A program can consist of any number of named segments, to be
combined in numerous exotic ways to produce the final program.
You can redirect your object output from one segment to another
in your assembly, by providing a SEGMENT directive before each
piece of code.  You can even return to a segment you started
earlier, by repeating a SEGMENT with the same name-- the
assembler just picks up where it left off, subject to some
possible skipping for memory-alignment, that I'll describe
shortly.

The specifications following the word SEGMENT help to describe
how the code in this module's part of the segment will be
combined with code for the same segment name given in other
modules; and also how this named segment will be grouped with
other named segments.  Other assemblers require the
specifications to be given in the order indicated.  A86 will
accept any order, and will accept commas between the
specifications if you want to provide them.  The only restriction
is that "AT number" must be followed by a comma if it is not the
last specification on the line.

The "align" specification tells if each piece of code within the
segment should be aligned so that its starting address is an even
multiple of some number.  BYTE alignment means there is no
requirement; WORD alignment requires each piece to start at a
                                                          10-9
multiple of 2; PARA alignment, at a multiple of 16; PAGE
alignment, at a multiple of 256.  For example, suppose you have a
segment containing memory variables.  You can declare the segment
with the statement "VAR_DATA SEGMENT WORD", which insures that
the segment is aligned to an even memory address.  That way you
can insure that all 16-bit and bigger memory quantities in the
segment are aligned to even addresses, for faster access on the
16-bit machines of the 86 family.

There are special rules governing alignment for multiple pieces
of the same named segment within the same program module.  Other
assemblers outlaw conflicting alignment specifications in this
situation; A86 accepts them, and uses the strictest specification
given.  Furthermore, the alignment given for any specification
beyond the first will control the alignment for that piece of
code within this module's chunk.  For example, if a program
contains two pieces of code headed by "VAR_DATA SEGMENT WORD",
A86 will insert a byte between the pieces if the first piece has
an odd number of bytes.  This insures correct assembly for
multiple files written for another assembler.

If no "align" type is given for any of the pieces of a named
segment, an alignment of PARA is assumed.


The "combine" specification tells how the chunk of code from this
module will be combined with the chunks of the same named
segment, that come from other modules.  Yes, I know, that sounds
like what "align" does; but "combine" takes a different, more
major point of view:

* PUBLIC is the kind of combination we've been talking about all
  along: each piece of the segment is located off the end of the
  previously linked piece, subject to possible gaps for
  alignment.  The size of the segment is the sum of the sizes of
  the pieces, plus the sizes of the gaps.

* STACK is a combination-type reserved for the system's stack
  segment.  To illustrate how STACK segment chunks are combined,
  let's describe the only way a stack segment should ever be
  used.  We'll call the segment PROG_STACK; and we declare it as
  follows:

    PROG_STACK SEGMENT WORD STACK
       DW 100 DUP (?)
    TOP_OF_STACK:

  The code just given declares a stack area of 200 bytes (100
  words) for this module.  If identical code occurs in each of
  three modules which are then linked together, the resulting
  PROG_STACK segment will have 600 bytes (the sizes are added),
  but TOP_OF_STACK will be the same address (600) for each module
  (each piece is overlayed at the top of the segment).  That way,
  every module can declare and access the top of the stack, which
  is the only static part of the stack that any code should ever
  refer to.
                                                          10-10

* COMMON is a type of memory area supported by FORTRAN.  Each
  module's chunk of a COMMON segment starts at location 0, and
  overlaps (usually duplicates) the pieces from all the other
  modules.  The size of a COMMON segment is the size of the
  largest chunk.

* MEMORY is supposed to be another kind of COMMON segment, that
  is distinguished by automatically being located beyond all
  other segments in memory.  The MS_DOS LINK program, however,
  does not implement MEMORY segments, and instead treats them
  identically to PUBLIC (not COMMON!) segments.  I can see no
  useful purpose to the MEMORY combine-type, since the
  functionality can be achieved by putting a COMMON segment into
  a 'class' by itself, that goes above all the other classes.  So
  don't use MEMORY.

  Sorry, I don't support the assembly of multiple files written
  for other assemblers, that contain STACK, COMMON, or MEMORY
  segments.  If I did, I would have to detect the file breaks,
  and duplicate the overlapping functionality of these segment
  types.  Since I don't think anybody out there is using these
  esoteric types, I didn't bother to support them to that extent.
  Objections, anyone?

* "AT number" defines a non-combinable segment at the absolute
  memory location whose segment register value is "number".  This
  form is useful for initializing data in fixed locations, such
  as the 86 interrupt vector (IVECTOR SEGMENT AT 0 followed by
  ORG 4 * INT_NUMBER), or for reading fixed memory locations,
  such as the BIOS variables area (BIOS_DATA SEGMENT AT 040).

The combine-type specification can be repeated in subsequent
pieces of a given segment, but if it is, it must be the same in
all pieces.

Finally, if no combine-type is ever given for a named segment in
a module, that segment is non-combinable-- no other modules may
define that segment; the code given in the one module constitutes
the entire segment.

The last specification available on a SEGMENT line is the class
name, which is identified by being enclosed in single quotes.
Unlike a segment name, which can be used as an instruction
operand an hence cannot conflict with other assembler symbols, a
class name can be assigned without regard to its usage elsewhere
in the program.  It can even be a built-in A86 mnemonic.  In
fact, both the SMALL and LARGE high-level-language models specify
the class name 'CODE' for code segments, and the SMALL model
specifies the class name 'DATA'.

If no class name is given for a segment, A86 specifies the null
(zero-length) string as the class name.
                                                          10-11
DATA SEGMENT, STRUC and CODE SEGMENT Directives

The DATA SEGMENT and STRUC directives work in .OBJ mode exactly
as they do in .COM mode-- they define a special assembly mode, in
which declarations are made, but no object code is output.
Offsets within DATA segments and structures are absolute, as in
.COM mode.  Assembly resumes as before when an ENDS or CODE
SEGMENT directive is encountered.


The ENDS Directive

Syntax:  [seg_name] ENDS

The ENDS directive closes out the segment currently being
assembled, and returns assembly to the segment being assembled
before the last SEGMENT directive.  The "seg_name", if given,
must match the name in that last SEGMENT directive.  ENDS allows
you to "nest" segments inside one another.  For example, you can
declare some static data variables that are specific to a certain
section of code at the top of that section:

  _DATA SEGMENT BYTE PUBLIC 'DATA'
    VAR1  DB ?
    VAR2  DB ?
  _DATA ENDS

These four lines can be inserted inside any other segment being
assembled.  They will cause the two variable allocations to be
tacked onto the segment _DATA; and assembly will then continue in
whatever segment surrounded the four lines.  Observe that the
"nesting" does not occur in the final program; only the
presentation of the source code is nested.

If you are not nesting segments inside one another, then the ENDS
directive serves only to lend a clean, "block-structured"
appearance to your source code.  It does not assist A86 in any
particular way; in fact, it consumes a bit more object output
memory (slightly reducing object output capacity) if you have
ENDSs, rather than just starting up new segments with SEGMENT
directives.


Default Outer SEGMENT

Other assemblers outlaw any code outside of a SEGMENT
declaration, forcing you to give a SEGMENT declaration before you
can assemble anything.  A86 lets you assemble just your code; you
don't have to worry about SEGMENTs if you don't want to.

If you do provide code outside of all SEGMENT declarations, A86
performs the following steps, to find a reasonable place to put
the code:

1. If there are any segments explicitly declared whose name is or
   ends with "_TEXT", then the first such segment declared is
   used.  It is as if the SEGMENT declaration appeared at the top
   of, rather than within, the program.
                                                          10-12
2. If there is no such explicit segment, A86 creates a BYTE
   PUBLIC segment of class 'CODE', and proceeds to construct a
   name for the segment.  If there are no RETF instructions in
   the outer segment, the name chosen is "_TEXT", conforming to
   the SMALL model of computation.  If there is a RETF
   instruction, the name chosen is "modulename_TEXT", where
   "modulename" is the name of this module.  Recall that
   "modulename" comes from the NAME directive if there is one;
   from the name of the .OBJ file if there isn't.


The GROUP Directive

Syntax:  group_name GROUP seg_name1, seg_name2, ...

The GROUP directive causes A86 to tell LINK that all the listed
segments can fit into a single 64K-byte block of memory, and
instruct LINK to make that fit.  (If they won't fit, LINK will
issue an error message.)  Having declared the group, you can then
use "group_name" as the segment register value that will allow
simultaneous access to all the named segments.  The order of
names given in the list does not necessarily determine the order
the segments will finally appear within the group.

The most useful application of the GROUP directive is to allow
you to structure the pieces of a program, all of whose code and
data will fit into a single 64K segment.  You organize the pieces
into SEGMENTs, and declare all the SEGMENTs to be within the same
GROUP.  When the program starts, all segment registers are set to
point to the GROUP, and you never have to worry about segment
registers again in the program.

WARNING: If your segments will be GROUPed in the final program,
you should have the appropriate GROUP directive in every module
assembled.  If you don't, then any memory pointers generated will
be relative to the beginning of the individual named segments,
not to the beginning of the whole group.

Because of the obscure scenario I described in the Overview
section, Intel does not prohibit more than one GROUP from
containing some of the same segments; so neither does A86.  Any
pointers within a segment will be calculated from the beginning
of the last GROUP that the segment was declared within.  But
again, I have my doubts as to whether LINK will handle this
correctly.